Editor’s note: Below find a special report about Church Hill’s ongoing l’affair pétanque. If you haven’t yet, please consider upgrading to keep independent journalism about your neighborhood free for all to read. Here’s how to submit tips, documents, correspondence, etc. with The Lookout for editorial consideration. Regular programming resumes next week.—Dave.

On Sunday, dozens of Church Hill residents gathered at Chimborazo Playground to discuss the sudden construction of additional courts for pétanque, an obscure-in-America bowling game similar to bocce that a local club has played in the neighborhood for two decades. Despite the shade provided by the park’s sycamore trees, the conversation about development processes and priorities for the beloved 3.5-acre green space at times turned heated.

Les Boulefrogs Pétanque Club of Virginia and Community for Chimbo Playground (CCP)—the name of a newly formed grassroots group that has obtained hundreds of signatures on an online petition to halt the buildout until more of the neighborhood has a chance to offer input on the project—and their respective supporters established little common ground. But pretty much everybody agreed on one thing: out of any party involved in l’affair pétanque, City Hall has the most to answer for.

“We were hoping to have an authoritative voice like [City Council President and longtime 7th District representative] Cynthia Newbille to talk to us, or the director” of Richmond’s Departments of Parks, Recreation, and Community Facilities (DPR) said Will Jordan-Cooley, a born-and-raised Church Hill resident and a CCP co-organizer. Alas, despite direct invitations to Newbille and Mayor Danny Avula (a tenured East Ender in his own right), and much frantic outreach to various DPR officials about the unannounced expansion of Chimborazo Playground’s already-considerable pétanque facilities, nobody from 900 East Broad Street appeared at the meeting.

“The problem is that there is nobody here from the city of Richmond,” said Donnie Glass, the owner of Grisette and a resident of Church Hill North, addressing a crowd that numbered about 40 at its height. “There isn't a councilmember, there isn't a Parks Department person, there is nobody here to say, ‘Well, this is why this paperwork got held up for this long, and this is why the funding went to that.’”

Karen Morris-Rankin, the president of the Boulefrogs, echoed this frustration with city officials’ poor communication. “Parks does not move quickly, they move on their own time,” she said, visibly distressed by what several of the meeting’s attendees described as “acrimony” and “vitriol.” “They do not give quick notification on when they're going to do anything.”

The Lookout has reviewed emails from CCP organizers to Mayor Avula and Cynthia Newbille soliciting their attendance at the meeting. The East End politicians did not immediately respond to requests for comment sent Sunday evening, nor did Christopher Frelke, DPR’s director.

Clarification (5/13/26): After publication, Avula’s press secretary Mira Signer contacted The Lookout noting that the short turnaround time between when organizers extended the invitation to the meeting and when it took place made it impossible to attend, referencing an accordion section of the mayor’s website that instructs planners to submit invitations “at least eight (8) weeks prior” to events. (It rarely takes that long, she added.)This piece has been updated to reflect Signer’s confirmation that Avula is now aware of l’affair pétanque. Newbille’s office still has not addressed questions from The Lookout about attendees’ disappointment at her absence.

🤝 Help fund The Lookout!

Your subscription defrays the cost of original journalism about our neighborhood. Support independent local media by becoming a paid subscriber today:

The Lookout’s regular coverage will always be free to read for all, because that’s how a neighborhood newsletter should be. But if you’re able to afford it, I hope you’ll consider contributing to its operating budget by upgrading today. If you’re owner/wealthy individual looking to make larger contribution, please get in touch at [email protected].—Dave.

Ironically, the speed at which Parks moved last week to bulldoze, grade, and gravel two new plots for an unknown number of additional pétanque courts is part of what has caused so much strife over them. As The Lookout reported Friday, a crew showed up Tuesday and dramatically transformed a chunk of Chimborazo Playground’s lawn in just three days, catching many in the neighborhood off-guard—even plugged-in local activists and self-avowed “power users” of the space.

Of the ~220 respondents to the CCP’s survey about the construction (which circulated via groupchats, social media, and QR-coded flyers the group posted in the neighborhood last week), not one of them said they had been aware of the planned plow-job, co-organizer Jordan-Cooley said.

While various Boulefrogs conceded at Sunday’s meeting that the club’s 45 members could have done a better job notifying their neighbors of the impending work, which Morris-Rankin said she learned about approximately two weeks prior to its start, residents on every side of the issue laid most of the blame on Richmond’s byzantine bureaucracy, where Mayor Avula’s campaign promises of transparency have translated into so little of it that the Electronic Frontier Foundation and MuckRock in March named the city its 2026 “City of Darkness.”

A CCP flyer soliciting neighborhood feedback on the construction and attendance at Sunday’s meeting. | Dave Infante

At 5:15pm Friday evening, roughly two hours after The Lookout published its report and five hours after a deadline issued midday Wednesday, the acting deputy director, public affairs within the city’s Office of Strategic Communications & Civic Engagement, provided an official statement on the construction. Wrote Tamara Jenkins (emphasis added):

❝

PRCF leadership and staff have been working with the Les Boulefrogs Pétanque Club of Virginia on improvements to the existing pétanque courts for several years. In addition to requests for court expansion, the club has also advocated for upgrades to the playground and restroom facilities.

During the Richmond INSPIRE public planning workshop held on September 12, 2024, at Powhatan Community Center, community members — including East End residents and members of the pétanque club — expressed support for improvements to the only city owned pétanque courts in located at Chimborazo Playground.

Because this project expands an existing approved amenity within the park, PRCF agreed to move forward with the request. It is standard practice for the department to support enhancements and improvements to existing recreational facilities when feasible. Funding has already been allocated in the current fiscal year and Fiscal Year 2027 not only for the court expansion, but also for long-needed improvements to the playground and restroom facilities. Those improvements to the bathrooms and water fountains are planned to be made Fiscal Year 2027.

Jenkins’ response, which did not fully address specific questions The Lookout put to DPR via email, can be read in full here. City officials identified by the Boulefrogs’ Morris-Rankin as involved in the planning process, including DPR deputy director Shamar Young and senior capital project manager Haywood Harrison, have not responded to requests for comment. It still is not clear how much this project is costing taxpayers: while an unofficial proposal obtained by The Lookout puts the price around $17,000, a review of the previous three years of Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) budgets surfaced no mention of pétanque.

The Lookout followed up with Jenkins Sunday afternoon to request an interview with Frelke next week to elucidate this matter.

On Friday evening, the CCP emailed its survey respondents noting that organizers had happened to encounter Newbille on East Broad Street in Church Hill and informed her of distress over the project. “[S]he assured us she is looking into it,” wrote Jordan-Cooley and Erika Stanley.

If she is, that’s a new development. “CM Newbille was not aware of this expansion and [sic] recognize advance notice to the community is always appreciated,” Jenkins added. (The Lookout had not asked DPR whether Newbille, who has represented the 7th District for 17 years, knew about the work in advance.) The Lookout has inquired with Newbille’s office about the CCP’s description of the street-side encounter.

Even as they commiserated with CCP supporters over the DPR’s derelict communication and the absence of Newbille and Avula at the hour-long meeting, the Boulefrogs and their fellow travelers declined multiple entreaties to compromise about the merit of the courts themselves, which stand in a state of partial completion directly to the east of three existing pits already dedicated to this niche sport. (The Boulefrogs “ceded” a fourth court, on the southwest of the cluster, to a “surprise hoop” structure in 2024. This wasn’t pure altruism: that court had long been susceptible to flooding, and was unfavored by the club due to its separation from the others.)

“They went through the proper avenues,” said resident Ryan Walter, referring to the Boulefrogs, about whom he spoke in support several times. “They were not taking it or stealing space from other people […] So I find the distaste towards that pretty distasteful myself.”

“For you to say we followed the rules, sure you followed the rules, absolutely,” said Ben Lazarus, another resident, addressing comments from Morris-Rankin. “The courts are built because you followed the rules. But we're also all neighbors, so to not seek out comment, to not seek out a conversation” with uninvolved parkgoers contributes to a sense that the Boulefrogs had played “insider baseball” to get their way “in the dead of night.”

Mark Rankin, the club’s secretary and Morris-Rankin’s husband, took umbrage with the insinuations of that some clandestine pétanque plot had been exposed, a contention that seems to have gained some traction on various Church Hill-oriented social media thanks to his wife’s dual role as the Boulefrogs’ president and the Friends of Chimborazo Park’s treasurer. “Being a member of more than one organization [simultaneously] does not imply collusion or conspiracy,” he said. (The Friends of Chimborazo Playground Facebook page has not responded to a request for comment sent Thursday.)

After roughly an hour of conversation, CCP co-organizer Stanley took the mic to wrap the meeting. “If we can just hit the pause button [on construction] so that we can all have a fuller picture of what is happening and be able to weigh in that that's going to be a really solid outcome,” she said. In his own closing remarks, Jordan-Cooley called on attendees to contact Newbille, Avula, and Frelke to demand they halt the project to allow for more community input. “I hope that the pétanque players will do it as well,” he said.

Morris-Rankin, Walters, and other pro-pétanque attendees declined to make such a commitment.

This has been a Lookout special report. Regular programming resumes next week. Please submit tips, photos, etc. about the East End for editorial consideration.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

M V6 months ago

I walk to and through Chimbarazo park every day. I don’t have a problem with the petanque courts addition - sounds like the petanque team is bringing the community together for an activity and improving the parks. Hope we can get some more updates to all parks - more mulch to the playground!

Avatar

Dave InfanteAuthor6 months ago

Yeah the mulch on the playground (or lack thereof) was a brief topic of discussion yesterday as well. A few parents of small children that play there expressed frustration that Parks has failed do do something so cheap and simple as remulching that area even as it does something as comparatively expensive and complex as build new pétanque courts. In Jenkins' statement, this receives indirect mention:

"Funding has already been allocated in the current fiscal year and Fiscal Year 2027 not only for the court expansion, but also for long-needed improvements to the playground and restroom facilities. Those improvements to the bathrooms and water fountains are planned to be made Fiscal Year 2027."

Still, it's not clear if mulching is specifically one of the actions budgeted for, or when it will happen. I'm working to get more information from the department.

Avatar

lilacs doom6 months ago

I can see how the basketball court, playground, and garden could help bring the community together. These gravel pits in the middle of the park appear to be used only a couple of times a week by a relatively small group.

While I’m glad people have a space to play and socialize, it does raise concerns about the trade-off, particularly the permanent loss of green space for limited use. It feels worth taking a closer look at whether this balance best serves the broader community.

Avatar

Dave InfanteAuthor6 months ago

Yeah, that's what the Community for Chimborazo Playground is requesting: a pause in construction to allow for more community input.

Avatar

M V6 months ago

Well, I do not garden, I do not utilize the basketball court, and I do not use the playground. Just because I do not use those, does that mean that we should not have them because that's not my direct community? I love when I see people play basketball but the courts are not used all day. I do not even play petanque. I enjoy that I can walk through the park and see the group playing a game. And to call this group relatively small is a grotesque misstatement.

Do I want the city to get my opinion if there is a new garden bed put in? Or a new slide? I play pickleball and I go to an area that has a pickleball court. If I want to ply petanque, i will go here. I spent enough time in that park to know that the "green space" was hard, rocky, and directly in the sun. We are so lucky and privileged to live in a neighborhood with many parks and green space. Fairness feels like oppression to those who have lived privileged lives. I'm excited to see the finished courts on my daily walks.

Avatar

lilacs doom6 months ago

So the argument is that the space taken wasn’t really “green space” because it was hard, rocky, and in the sun — and that people who want open space should simply go somewhere else? That’s exactly why many residents are concerned. Public parks are shared spaces, and decisions about changing them should consider the broader community, not just one organized group.

Avatar

M V6 months ago

That's not my only point above (not argument, I am genuinely curious and hoping to understand your perspective more) but if we want to focus on that aspect, we can. I'm not saying it isn't exactly "green space" but it wasn't exactly comfortable to walk on/stand on or even play on either. I recognize that public parks are shared spaces so that is why I'm confused why there is concern over every single area of the park. I would understand if a playground was being torn down, or even the trees. But just expanding an already existing section of the park seems to be not a big deal, in my opinion. There is still green space, yes less of it, but it's still there. I hope in the future the city can provide advanced notice for these updates but there I do not see any reason at all to halt the construction. Sounds like the group went through all of the proper channels for approval. I hope we get other improvements to the park too

Avatar

Brett Eastman 6 months ago

It’s not the vote of the majority, it’s the will of who’s in charge. Over 10 years ago we packed out that chimbo building multiple times with 3 generations of bmxers and skaters wanting a pocket skatepark. Very few if any bull frogs ever showed up. We were diligent and effective with plans and proposals. Worked with the budget given. I remember one meeting the only bullfrog that showed pitched a fit. In response a woman with a child in a stroller pointed in the stroller and said, “this park is not for us but for our kids.” Months later parks and rec destroyed the park with pits that ate up wandering toddlers and created such a mosquito problem in spring that nobody even wanted to hang out there anymore.

Avatar

Dave InfanteAuthor6 months ago

I have heard a little bit about past calls for a skate/BMX park there, but would love to hear more. Was the idea that those facilities might be in Chimborazo Playground instead of down in Gillies Creek? I.e., was the Gillies Creek one built at that point? Do you remember approximately when this was all going down? What were the major objections voiced at the time?

Avatar

Brett Eastman 6 months ago

Not sure of the exact year, but this was way before the city had any hand in Gillies. There was the track run by Richmond BMX and the trails that were run by a private group of riders. The city threatened demolition of the bmx trails if insurance wasn’t provided. After reluctant negotiations w/ the IMBA they provided insurance under the condition that more resources were provided. (Beginner pump track) To my knowledge there was little objection to a skatepark other than noise. I think all the supporters were really surprised how much the idea was squashed by so few that weren’t being vocal. I can’t recall the name of the parks & rec gentleman we worked with, but even he was surprised with the outcome. Shortly after most directed their efforts towards the grand goal of the park in Southside.

Avatar

lilacs doom6 months ago

Thank you for the fair coverage of this perplexing situation. When more than 200 residents are surprised by a major change to a neighborhood park, it’s a clear sign that something in the process isn’t working.

Public parks aren’t a blank canvas for any one group, and decisions that significantly change shared green space should involve transparent communication and community awareness. When people feel blindsided by a project of this scale, it inevitably erodes trust in the process.

Residents aren’t trying to block park improvements — they’re simply asking for clarity about how this project moved forward and whether the proper steps were followed. At this point, it would be helpful to hear directly from the Department of Parks and Recreation about how the project was approved and how community input was considered.

Avatar

Dave InfanteAuthor6 months ago

In an email exchange with Jenkins on Sunday night, I requested an interview with Parks director Christopher Frelke this week. We'll see what happens.

Avatar

Suz G6 months ago

Am I the only one really hoping the lack of green space will result in less off leash dogs at the park? I'm so tired of off leash dogs running up to kids on the playground, it's not safe and it keeps a lot of people from feeling comfortable using the playground.

Avatar

Dave InfanteAuthor6 months ago

Ha! I have heard a few folks make this point, actually. I filed a column about the off-leash situation last year: https://www.chlookout.com/p/how-to-curb-off-leash-dogs-in-church-hill

Perhaps that will be a silver lining of all this. Or maybe not.

Avatar

Sam Abdelmuti6 months ago

Thank you for such a great article for real! This really paints a good picture of what is happening and I appreciate you!

Avatar

Dave InfanteAuthor6 months ago

Hey thanks for reading, glad you find the coverage helpful.

Avatar

Susan H6 months ago

Watching all this from the less affluent side of the neighborhood is disheartening. Please move on. Surely there are bigger fish to fry.

Dave as a former grassroots local journalist I will tell you from experience to free yourself from the weeds of this and get into something more interesting and useful. It’s a playground with a thing in it next to two of the biggest green spaces in the city. We’ll all live. More about blight! More about traffic calming! I’d love to hear about what’s up with real estate and new builds and the latest on zoning. You’re so good at that. Why Spotty Dog isn’t open until 10 in the hot months! The burning question. I love you and cherish you and am glad you exist, but step back.

Avatar

Dave InfanteAuthor6 months ago

Thanks for the note, Susan. With the exception of Spotty Dog's business hours (which I don't foresee reporting on any time soon), The Lookout has covered all the topics you've mentioned, and will continue to. If you have tips about any/all of those matters, please get in touch, here's how: https://www.chlookout.com/submit-a-tip

Sorry you feel disheartened by l'affair pétanque. If it makes you feel any better, it seems like a lot of folks seem to be, for various reasons!