🛍️ The Lookout Shop is now open!
Score a sweet Lookout hat and support independent media about your neighborhood! Shop now.

If you stopped 10 people on East Broad Street and asked them what their favorite thing is about Church Hill, nine of them would definitely say “the free neighborhood newsletter full of news and views from Richmond’s East End that hits my inbox sometime between the hours of noon and midnight every Friday.” Right? Right??? Yes. But the 10th person, a hater of independent media to their very core, might instead say “the walkability.”
Walkability! The ability to walk places! It’s a foundational joy of living in a city. Not being forced to get in your car and drive to a soul-sucking strip mall just to get a coffee, a meal, a book? That’s the good shit, folks. Church Hill is not nearly as safe and walkable as it should be; decades of political neglect have left its non-car-centric infrastructure lacking, like many other parts of Richmond. But by virtue of its sheer age, Church Hill is dense, which makes it inherently more navigable by foot. And thanks to fierce and ongoing neighborhood advocacy, the city is (slowly) making Church Hill’s street’s safer.
Good! Now put a Hill Cafe on every corner and a Chimbo Sandwich Shoppe on every block, because I want to walk to them all.
Now. NOW. I don’t actually think 90% of the people you stop on E. Broad St. would actually say The Lookout is the best thing about this neighborhood, just like I don’t actually think that the entire Church Hill grid should be covered with those two restaurants, or even restaurant generally. I would settle for a capacious coffee shop like Riverbend Roastery on some corners, and a cute-ass used bookstore like Brian’s Books on some blocks. I’m open to negotiation. Maybe let’s plunk a convenient mart like Clay Street Market here or there, while we’re at it. I’m open to negotiation. But as a general principle, I think the more small, consumer-facing businesses operating within walking distance of more East Enders, the better.
If this recent story from The Richmonder’s housing reporter Sarah Vogelsong on how the city’s code refresh would treat commercial spaces in residential neighborhoods is any indication, not everybody in Richmond feels likewise. “Under the current plan,” wrote Vogelsong (emphasis mine throughout):
Many Richmonders worry that introducing business into residential areas will fundamentally change their neighborhoods for the worse, introducing traffic, noise and crime and driving down property values.
When William “Buster” Johnson bought his house in Barton Heights on the Northside more than 25 years ago, he said he entered into a “social contract” with the city.
“You’re telling me that nobody can put a doggy daycare next door to me,” he said. “Now you’re coming back and telling me you’re going to allow that?”
[…]
“Commercial uses in family-oriented neighborhoods will be dangerous,” wrote one respondent [to a survey conducted by the Hampton Gardens Association, which found “overwhelming opposition” to the idea] in results shared with the Planning Department. “No sidewalks. Kids walk in the street. Commercial traffic will be very dangerous.”
I don’t want to dunk on these people. Frankly, I think some of the concerns they express are legitimate. (The notion that buying a home in Richmond a quarter-century ago created a socially contracted status quo: less legitimate.)
Small businesses are not guaranteed to be good neighbors just by virtue of being small businesses; litter, traffic, and petty crime are real quality-of-life issues; one person’s cute-ass used bookstore is another’s harbinger of rising property tax assessments. But most of these issues can and should be addressed with proper regulation, consistent administration, and better infrastructure, rather than a blanket rejection of commercial infill. Richmond’s streets aren’t safe for kids? Yes, correct, I agree. But that’s an argument for making them safer, not against allowing more neighborhood businesses.
What about vape shops? you might be wondering. Good news for you: per Vogelsong, “the city earlier this year imposed strict rules on new vape shops that prohibit them from residential areas.” As for that “doggy daycare” hypothetical (which is all it is, for now), most of Church Hill’s residential lots are designated “residential attached” or “residential multi-unit” in the current proposal; the former would offer no by-right commercial use, and the latter would only allow by-right operation depending on square footage. In other words, you wouldn’t be able to slam, like, a Pet Paradise-style facility into a single-family rowhome.
Church Hill already serves as a model for the city of the knock-on benefits of having walkable commerce within a neighborhood. You can have a couple drinks at Grisette without getting behind the wheel; you can grab a last-minute birthday gift at Kind Hearted Goods without schlepping to Carytown or [shudder] Short Pump. It rules, and I love it. I want more of that walkability, for more of the neighborhood and the city. This is the way.
🤝 Help fund The Lookout!
Your subscription defrays the cost of original journalism about our neighborhood. Support independent local media by becoming a paid subscriber today:
The Lookout’s regular coverage will always be free to read for all, because that’s how a neighborhood newsletter should be. But if you’re able to afford it, I hope you’ll consider contributing to its operating budget by upgrading today. If you’re owner/wealthy individual looking to make larger contribution, please get in touch at [email protected].—Dave.
📜 Possum Poetry

Spotted at Libby Hill Park. | Penelope Poubelle
Through your garbage, I rummage for my appetite’s fix;
But I don’t have much use for a toddler’s cast-off kicks.
Possum Poetry is original verse written exclusively for The Lookout by Penelope Poubelle, the Lookout’s litter critter-at-large. If you spot roadside trash you’d like her to immortalize in doggerel, email a photo to [email protected]. All submissions anonymous!
🤐 Newbille silent on city’s payment register failures, subpoenaing Avula
Last week, The Richmonder reported that City Hall had tried to charge the publication ~$5,700 to produce public records it is required by law to proactively publish. Here’s reporter Graham Moomaw (emphasis mine):
The city has been legally required to post the data since 2015, when the City Council passed an ordinance requiring the payment register to be published and updated on a monthly basis. That proposal mirrored an earlier move by the Richmond School Board to publish a similar financial log for the school system online.
The city stopped publishing its payment register in 2019 during the first term of former Mayor Levar Stoney. The school system has continued to publish its payment register, which remains available online.
It was the latest development in Mayor Danny Avula’s months of deflections over the payment register, which is meant to offer the public some of that transparency he campaigned on and touts often. By law, reporters and citizens shouldn’t even have to ask for comprehensive payment data, much less be charged an exorbitant fee to access that information. Avula—a long-time East Ender whose first year in office coincided with Richmond’s first-ever “City of Darkness” faux-ward from pro-sunlight orgs Muckrock and the Electronic Frontier Foundation in recognition of “the worst in government transparency” nationwide—has repeatedly insisted3 that the city simply can’t comply with the law as written due to staffing issues, a claim belied by the fact that RPS, not known for being especially well-funded or -staffed, has been doing it this whole time.
As Moomaw reported, the city’s payment register, when it was still being maintained, “was a resource journalists and community activists could use to keep tabs on how much money was being spent with specific companies.”1 Without a functioning register, councilmembers can’t get a full picture of what City Hall is up to, either, which is why in early March, Cm. Kenya Gibson (3rd District) threatened to invoke the body’s rarely used subpoena power to force Avula to disclose these data.
Cynthia Newbille, City Council president and longtime 7th District representative, has been a member of the council since before it passed the original ordinance in 2015. The Lookout contacted her to ask whether she supported Gibson’s plan to subpoena Avula over the payment register, and what actions she had taken, if any, to demand that Stoney and Avula comply with the rule. She did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
Don’t forget to drop your top tips for neighborhood newcomers to help build The Lookout’s Ultimate Church Hill Welcome Guide:
The comments are already popping off with dining recommendations, City Hall hacks, and more. Drop yours here. I was particularly intrigued by Emily G’s note that there are free wine tastings on Thursdays at Second Bottle, Union Market, Friend Bar, and Giorno Market. I didn’t realize those all fell on the same day. Now that the weather is nice, you could turn this into a little crawl with a little planning (and maybe a bicycle.) Is that a future Lookout outing? Hmm.
📢 Happenings on The Hill
Snag it: Nowhere Thrift is popping up tomorrow (4/4) from 9am-2pm at Giorno Market, where Sunday Bagel will be selling breakfast 10am-12pm or sellout. Details here and here.
Wash it: Tomorrow from 1-4pm-ish, the Bike Monday Bros are posting up at Richbrau Brewery to wash and tune-up bikes now that it’s cycling season. More details.
Answer it: Kahlo’s Taqueria & Bar is hosting trivia night on Wednesday (4/8) at 7pm. Flyer right here.
Plan it: The Little Market is coming back on Sunday (4/12), and accepting sign-ups from “Little Vendors” in the neighborhood. Flyer here, sign-up form here, previous coverage here.
Reserve it: Blue Atlas is now taking reservations for its Vegan Takeover, which runs 4/15-19. Grab yours.
Happenings on The Hill is a digital bulletin board for events, causes, and other items of interest to East Enders that don’t necessarily merit full editorial treatment. Got something for a future edition? Email the relevant details, links, etc. to [email protected] for consideration!
📸 A Very CHill Photo

Posting up. | Windsor Bisbee, iPhone 16 Pro
Want to share your Very CHill Photo from the neighborhood? Email it to [email protected] with your name as you’d like it to appear for publication, and the camera you shot it on.
1 That would have been an enormous help as I was conducting my Flock investigation earlier this year for The Richmonder. Instead, I had to wait 12 working days for the city to generate a mere 48-row spreadsheet that would have been useless without contracts I’d already obtained through other public-records requests. At least they didn’t try to charge me for that one?
2 Barton Heights, for what it’s worth, would mostly be rezoned “residential detached,” which allows for no by-right commercial operation in residential areas, either. So without knowing exactly where Buster Johnson lives, it seems unlikely that he would wake up one day in a rezoned Richmond to find a whole-ass doggy daycare next door.
3 “The current reporting requirement, adopted in 2015, has not functioned as intended,” claimed the mayor’s office in a press release on March 26th issued just hours before City Hall dropped its eye-popping bill on The Richmonder. A less charitable read on the situation suggests it’s Avula himself who isn’t functioning as the law intended—especially given he also signaled he plans to try to introduce legislation to revise the 2015 requirement.




